We need to talk about what just happened in Virginia, because it’s one of the most satisfying moments in recent political history. Democrats drew a congressional redistricting map so absurdly, laughably, insultingly rigged — carving out a 10-1 partisan advantage in a state that’s roughly split — that a judge took one look at it and ruled the whole thing unconstitutional.
Ten to one. They wanted ten seats out of eleven. In Virginia. A state where roughly half the population votes Republican. They looked at the map, looked at the math, looked at each other, and said “yeah, let’s just take everything.” And a judge said “absolutely not.”
This is the Wile E. Coyote moment we’ve been waiting for. Democrats strapped themselves to an ACME rocket labeled “TOTAL GERRYMANDER,” aimed it at the Constitution, and watched it blow up in their faces while the Road Runner beeped twice and drove away.
Let’s set the scene. After gaining enough control of Virginia’s redistricting process, Democrats pushed through a congressional map that would’ve given them ten out of eleven seats. For those of you keeping score at home, that’s a 91% share of representation in a state where they don’t come anywhere close to 91% of the vote. That’s not redistricting. That’s annexation.
They weren’t even subtle about it. Most gerrymanderers at least try to make the map look vaguely reasonable. They’ll sacrifice one district to make the others look organic. They’ll draw a few competitive seats so they can say “see, it’s fair” with a straight face. Not these guys. They went full hog. Ten out of eleven. Take it or leave it.
Well, a Virginia judge just chose “leave it” — and threw the whole thing in the garbage where it belongs.
The ruling declared the map unconstitutional. Not “problematic.” Not “in need of adjustment.” Unconstitutional. That’s the legal equivalent of a teacher writing “SEE ME AFTER CLASS” in red ink across the top of your paper, except the paper is a congressional map and “after class” means “in front of the entire state.”
Now here’s the part that makes this even sweeter. This gerrymander was so egregious that it actually turbocharged the VEXIT movement — that’s the growing push among western Virginia counties to secede from Virginia and join West Virginia. Think about that for a second. Democrats drew a map so offensive to the concept of fair representation that entire counties started looking at the state border and thinking “you know what, maybe the grass IS greener on the other side.”
When your redistricting map is so bad that it creates a secessionist movement, you might want to reconsider your approach.
But this is the modern Democratic Party we’re talking about. Reconsideration isn’t really in their playbook. Their playbook has three pages: take power, consolidate power, and accuse anyone who objects of being a threat to democracy.
Ah yes, democracy. Let’s talk about that word for a second, because Democrats sure love using it. “Democracy is on the ballot.” “We must protect our democracy.” “The other side is a threat to democracy.” They say it so often it’s basically a nervous tic at this point.
And then they draw a 10-1 gerrymander.
We need to understand what a 10-1 map actually means in practice. It means your vote doesn’t matter. It means the outcome is decided before a single ballot is cast. It means a Democrat in Richmond has already picked your congressman for you, and if you don’t like it, well, there’s always VEXIT.
That’s not democracy. That’s a menu with one item on it.
The beautiful irony here is that Democrats have spent years — years — screaming about Republican gerrymandering. They’ve filed lawsuits. They’ve organized protests. They’ve written op-eds with titles like “Gerrymandering Is Destroying American Democracy” and “How Republicans Rigged the Map.” They’ve turned anti-gerrymandering into a core part of their brand.
And then the moment they got the pen? Ten to one. Not even a blush.
It’s like watching someone give a passionate speech about the evils of speeding and then peel out of the parking lot at 120 miles an hour. The hypocrisy is so thick you could spread it on toast.
And let’s give credit where credit is due — to the judge who had the backbone to call this what it is. In an era where courts sometimes bend over backwards to avoid making political waves, this ruling was clear, direct, and devastating. The map is unconstitutional. Full stop. Go back and draw something that doesn’t look like it was designed by a partisan algorithm having a seizure.
What happens next? Democrats will appeal, obviously. They’ll claim the ruling is “politically motivated.” They’ll say the judge is “undermining the will of the voters” — which is rich coming from people who drew a map specifically designed to override the will of the voters. They’ll probably also mention Trump somehow, because they can’t help themselves.
But the ruling stands for now. And the VEXIT movement keeps growing. And the people of Virginia — including the ones in those western counties who were about to be gerrymandered into political irrelevance — just got a reminder that the system can still work.
Not always. Not perfectly. But sometimes a judge looks at a 10-1 map and says what everybody already knows: this is garbage, and we’re not doing it.
We’ll take that win. We’ll take it all day long.
And to the Democrats who drew that map — maybe next time try 8-3. At least make us work for the court victory.
Comments are closed.