A 29-year-old man from Ohio is dead because the state of Connecticut decided an illegal alien deserved a driver's license.
The illegal didn't sneak through Ohio's system. He got his credentials from a blue state 600 miles away — one that's handed out more than 60,000 driver's licenses to people who aren't supposed to be in the country in the first place.
Sen. Bernie Moreno, Republican of Ohio, made the connection public on September 1 when he fired off a letter to Connecticut Gov. Ned Lamont demanding answers. "My office has learned that an illegal alien granted a drivers license by the state of Connecticut killed a 29 year old Ohioan in a reckless driving accident," Moreno wrote.
Connecticut's program has issued north of 60,000 licenses to illegal aliens. The state treats this as a point of pride — a progressive credential, a signal to the right voters in Hartford and New Haven that their elected officials care about "inclusion." What they don't advertise is what happens when someone holding one of those licenses crosses a state line and kills somebody.
That's the part Ned Lamont would rather not discuss. His state created the document. His state verified the identity — or didn't, depending on how generous you want to be about the vetting process. His state put a laminated card in the hands of someone who had no legal right to be here. And someone in Ohio is dead.
Moreno's letter isn't just about one fatality, either. Marcus Coleman, a father whose 5-year-old daughter was severely disabled in a separate accident involving an illegal alien driver, has become a vocal advocate against these exact policies. The pattern isn't emerging. It's already here.
The left's defense of sanctuary licensing always follows the same script: it makes roads safer because immigrants will get tested and insured. That argument requires you to believe that a person who entered the country illegally, without regard for our laws, obtained fraudulent documents, and then drove recklessly was one DMV visit away from becoming a model motorist. The 29-year-old in Ohio might have something to say about that theory, except he can't.
What makes this particularly galling is the jurisdictional shell game. Connecticut passes the policy. Connecticut issues the card. But when the consequences show up in another state — a crash, a death, a shattered family — Connecticut bears zero accountability. Lamont doesn't have to attend the funeral. He doesn't have to face the victim's family at a town hall. He doesn't even have to answer Moreno's letter, though the political math of ignoring it gets worse by the day.
This is how blue-state governance actually works in practice. The benefits are local — the progressive bona fides, the favorable editorial boards, the activist donations. The costs get exported. Red states like Ohio gets the body count. Connecticut gets the progressive accolades.
Moreno is requesting a formal response from Lamont's office. Whether one arrives remains to be seen. Governors who build their brands on sanctuary policies tend to go quiet when those policies produce corpses in other zip codes.
Comments are closed.