Two million dollars. That's what Democrats spent on legal fees and signature gathering to get three ballot initiatives in front of Colorado voters this November — initiatives designed to redraw the state's congressional map in Democrats favor.
The Colorado Supreme Court threw all three of them out on Sunday.
The initiatives were filed by a group called Coloradans for a Level Playing Field, which is a name so brazen it deserves its own article. The plan was straightforward: temporarily suspend Colorado's independent redistricting commission, the one voters themselves created through a constitutional amendment back in 2018 specifically to prevent partisan gerrymandering, and replace the current maps with new ones that would hand Democrats three additional congressional seats for the 2028 and 2030 election cycles.
In other words, the party that has spent the last decade screaming about the sacred importance of independent redistricting wanted to pause the independent redistricting process the moment it stopped giving them the results they wanted.
Chief Justice Monica Marquez, writing for a unanimous court, was direct about it. "Changing the constitutionally mandated frequency of redistricting — however temporary the change — is not merely a mechanism to administer the new congressional district map," Marquez wrote. "Instead, it represents a seismic shift to Colorado's longstanding redistricting process enshrined in the state constitution."
The legal problem was the single subject requirement — a rule in Colorado law that says each ballot initiative can only address one topic. Democrats tried to get clever by splitting their scheme across three interlocking measures, each one conditioned on the passage of the others. Justice Richard L. Gabriel addressed that maneuver head-on: "To conclude otherwise and to allow initiative proponents to proceed with interlocking measures like those at issue here would allow proponents to achieve indirectly what they could not achieve directly and would endorse an end run around the single subject requirement. This we cannot do."
So the court caught the three-card monte. Good.
Now here's the part that makes this story matter beyond Colorado. This wasn't some grassroots effort by concerned citizens in Denver. This was a nationally coordinated play. The organizing group's ties run straight to Hakeem Jeffries' political orbit, and the goal was part of a larger Democratic strategy to claw back House seats through redistricting rather than, you know, winning arguments. Republicans currently project a net gain of around 11 seats nationally through the redistricting cycle. Colorado was supposed to cut that margin by three.
Curtis Hubbard, spokesperson for Coloradans for a Level Playing Field, responded to the ruling by calling it "the success of this partisan attempt to sideline Coloradans from responding to Donald Trump's unprecedented mid-decade redistricting scheme." Which is a fascinating way to describe a court enforcing the state's own constitution. The voters of Colorado created the independent redistricting commission in 2018. The court upheld the rules that protect it. Calling that "partisan" requires a definition of the word that doesn't appear in any dictionary.
The broader pattern here is worth noting. Democrats championed independent redistricting commissions for years as the antidote to Republican gerrymandering. Arizona, California, Michigan, Colorado — blue states lined up to take mapmaking out of legislators' hands. The pitch was always the same: let nonpartisan commissions draw fair maps, and democracy wins.
That pitch lasted right up until the commissions started drawing maps that didn't maximize Democratic seats. In Colorado, the independent commission produced a 4-4 split — which, in a state that leans blue, is arguably generous to Democrats already. But four seats wasn't enough. Seven was the target. So the commission had to go, temporarily of course, just long enough to ram through favorable maps for two election cycles.
The court saw through it unanimously. Not a single dissent. In a state where every Supreme Court justice was appointed by a Democratic governor, that's not nothing.
Two million dollars on signatures and lawyers. Three initiatives engineered to interlock like puzzle pieces. A front group with a focus-tested name. The full playbook, deployed in a state where Democrats already hold every statewide office.
And the thing that stopped it was a rule Colorado voters put in their own constitution eight years ago.
Comments are closed.